Monday, June 9, 2008

AkHirnYa SKB TerBit: MaSih BeLum TeGas!

Surat Keputusan Bersama (SKB) tiga menteri terkait Ahmadiyah akhirnya diterbitkan. SKB tiga menteri ini dikeluarkan Senin sore kemarin (09/06) dibacakan oleh Menteri Agama. SKB Menteri Dalam Negeri dan Jaksa Agung berisi tentang peringatan dan perintah kepada penganut, anggota dan/atau anggota anggota pengurus Jamaah Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI) dan Warga Masyarakat. Berbagai pihak menyebut SKB ini masih belum tegas soal Ahmadiyah.

Menteri Agama, Maftuh Basyuni menegaskan bahwa SKB ini bukan intervensi negara terhadap keyakinan seseorang melainkan upaya pemerintah dalam menjaga dan membentuk ketertiban masyarakat. SKB ini juga memberi peringatan pada jemaah Ahmadiyah yang mengaku agama Islam untuk menghentikan segala aktivitasnya.

"Jika pengurus jemaah Ahmadiyah tidak mengindahkan peringatan ini, akan dikenakan sanksi," tegas Maftuh.
Berikut isi dari SKB tiga menteri tersebut.
  1. Memberi peringatan dan memerintahkan kepada warga masyarakat untuk tidak menceritakan, menganjurkan atau mengusahakan dukungan umum melakukan penafsiran tentang suatu agama yang dianut di Indonesia atau melakukan kegiatan keagamaan yang menyerupai kegiatan keagamaan dari agama itu yang menyimpang dari pokok-pokok ajaran itu.
  2. Memberi peringatan dan memerintahkan kepada penganut, anggota dan/atau anggota pengurus Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI), sepanjang mengaku beragama Islam, untuk menghentikan penyebaran penafsiran dan kegiatan yang menyimpang dari pokok-pokok ajaran Agama Islam yaitu penyebaran faham yang mengakui adanya nabi dengan segala ajarannya setelah Nabi Muhammad SAW.
  3. Penganut, anggota, dan/atau anggota pengurus Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI) yang tidak mengindahkan peringatan dan perintah sebagaimana dimaksud pada diktum Kesatu dan Diktum Kedua dapat dikenai sanksi sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, termasuk organisasi dan badan hukumnya.
  4. Memberi peringatan dan memerintahkan kepada warga masyarakat untuk menjaga dan memelihara kerukunan umat beragama serta ketentraman dan ketertiban kehidupan bermasyarakat dengan tidak melakukan perbuatan dan/atau tindakan melawan hukum terhadap penganut, anggota, dan/atau anggota pengurus Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI).
  5. Warga masyarakat yang tidak mengindahkan peringatan dan perintah sebagaimana dimaksud pada Diktum Kesatu dan Diktum Keempat dapat dikenai sanksi sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan.
  6. Memerintahkan kepada aparat pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah untuk melakukan langkah-langkah pembinaan dalam rangka pengamanan dan pengawasan pelaksanaan Keputusan Bersama ini.
  7. Keputusan Bersama ini berlaku sejak tanggal ditetapkan.

SKB tiga menteri ini ditetapkan di Jakarta pada tanggal 9 Juni 2008, oleh Menteri Agama, Jaksa Agung dan Menteri Dalam Negeri.

SKB Belum Tegas

Sebagian kalangan menganggap SKB ini belum tegas dan masih belum menyentuh substansi persoalan Ahmadiyah. Menurut Ismail Yusanto Juru Bicara Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia dalam sebuah wawancara di salah satu televisi nasional menyebutkan ada dua substansi persoalan Ahmadiyah.

"Pertama sesuai dengan penilaian bakorpakem bahwa Ahmadiyah ini menyimpang dari Islam. Kedua Ahmadiyah ini telah melakukan penodaan agama, yakni menghina Nabi Muhammad dengan adanya Nabi setelah Muhammad dan menjadikan kitab tadzkirah sebagai kita suci mereka," kata Yusanto.

Sedangkan menurut Hedi Muhammad dari Aliansi Umat Islam (ALUMI) Jawa Barat mengatakan SKB ini masih tidak sesuai dengan harapan.

"Pada prinsipnya target Alumi, Ahmadiyah dibubarkan. Jadi kalau tidak dibubarkan, berarti tidak sesuai dengan harapan kami," kata Koordinator Alumi Hedi Muhammad.

Hal senada juga diungkapkan oleh pihak FPI yang mendesak Ahmadiyah dibubarkan. Menurut Ari Yusuf Amir pengacara dari FPI menyatakan keputusan pemerintah masih mengambang dan ambigu. Hal itu menandakan ketidaktegasan pemerintah pada kasus ini.

"Kan yang kita maksud pembubaran dan pelarangan," kata Ari Yusuf Amir.

The Prophet Muhammad's (saw) Marriages

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم


Introduction


As the propaganda war against Islam intensifies, the personality and conduct of our beloved Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم is coming under increasing scrutiny and attack from the kuffar. One area of focus for them is the marriages of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.

The following discussion is based on a translation of the chapter ‘The Prophet’s Marriages’ from the book ‘The Social System in Islam’ by Sheikh Taqiudeen an-Nabhani. The book can be downloaded in Arabic from here and English from here.


Permission to marry more than four wives

Allah تعالى revealed in the Holy Qur’an:

وَإِنۡ خِفۡتُمۡ أَلَّا تُقۡسِطُواْ فِى ٱلۡيَتَـٰمَىٰ فَٱنكِحُواْ مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ ٱلنِّسَآءِ مَثۡنَىٰ وَثُلَـٰثَ وَرُبَـٰعَ‌ۖ فَإِنۡ خِفۡتُمۡ أَلَّا تَعۡدِلُواْ فَوَٲحِدَةً أَوۡ مَا مَلَكَتۡ أَيۡمَـٰنُكُمۡ‌ۚ ذَٲلِكَ أَدۡنَىٰٓ أَلَّا تَعُولُواْ

“If you fear that you will not deal fairly with orphan girls, you may marry whichever [other] women seem good to you, two, three, or four. If you fear that you cannot be equitable [to them], then marry only one, or your slave(s): that is more likely to make you avoid bias.” [TMQ An-Nisa: 3]

At the end of the eighth year of the Hijra, after he had consummated all of his marriages with his wives, the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was at the time of the revelation of this verse married to more than four wives. However, he did not leave a single one of them but continued to be married to all his wives. This is because marriage to more than four wives is specific to him صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. It is clear that being married to more than four wives is unique to the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم and so he kept them after the revelation of this verse which limited marriage to four wives.

This is because the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم action does not contradict a statement that he makes. If there is a contradiction then the action is specific to him while the saying is general to the Ummah. It has been established in the foundations of jurisprudence (usul ul-fiqh) that the action of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم does not contradict his speech that is relevant to the Ummah, but actions of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم can be specific to him alone.

This is because his صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم order to the Ummah is more specific than the evidences calling for us to emulate him by following his actions and sayings. Thus, the general order is built on the specific order, and therefore it is not allowed to emulate the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم in an action in which there is a different order to the Ummah.

The Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to more than four wives, and the allowance for them to offer themselves to him in marriage etc, is confirmed by verses from the Holy Qur'an.

Allah تعالى says:

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ إِنَّآ أَحۡلَلۡنَا لَكَ أَزۡوَٲجَكَ ٱلَّـٰتِىٓ ءَاتَيۡتَ أُجُورَهُنَّ وَمَا مَلَكَتۡ يَمِينُكَ مِمَّآ أَفَآءَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيۡكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمِّكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمَّـٰتِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَالِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَـٰلَـٰتِكَ ٱلَّـٰتِى هَاجَرۡنَ مَعَكَ وَٱمۡرَأَةً۬ مُّؤۡمِنَةً إِن وَهَبَتۡ نَفۡسَہَا لِلنَّبِىِّ إِنۡ أَرَادَ ٱلنَّبِىُّ أَن يَسۡتَنكِحَہَا خَالِصَةً۬ لَّكَ مِن دُونِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَۗ قَدۡ عَلِمۡنَا مَا فَرَضۡنَا عَلَيۡهِمۡ فِىٓ أَزۡوَٲجِهِمۡ وَمَا مَلَڪَتۡ أَيۡمَـٰنُهُمۡ لِكَيۡلَا يَكُونَ عَلَيۡكَ حَرَجٌ۬ۗ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ غَفُورً۬ا رَّحِيمً۬ا

“Prophet, We have made lawful for you the wives whose bride gift (mahr) you have paid, and any slaves Allah has assigned to you through war, and the daughters of your uncles and aunts on your father’s and mother’s sides, who migrated with you. Also any believing women who has offered herself to the Prophet and whom the Prophet wishes to wed – this is a dispensation for you only [Prophet] and not the rest of the believers: We know exactly what We have made obligatory for them concerning their wives and slave-girls – so you should not be blamed: Allah is most forgiving, most merciful.” [TMQ Al-Ahzab: 50]

This verse says: “a dispensation for you only [Prophet] and not the rest of the believers.” The word خَالِصَةً۬ Khalisa (dispensation) in the verse is a verbal noun which confirms whatever preceded it i.e. a dispensation has been made for you by permitting what Allah تعالى has made lawful for you specifically.

The evidence to say that it includes all that precedes it and that it is specific to the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم is that it came after the four permissible matters of marrying wives, captives directly from the Fey’, daughters of his relations who have been mentioned amongst those that migrated with him, and a woman that directly offers herself for marriage. This is in addition to being stated in an emphatic manner as mentioned previously.

This is supported by the fact that at the completion of Allah’s تعالى saying: “not the rest of the believers,” His تعالى saying came: “We know exactly what We have made obligatory for them concerning their wives and slave-girls.” So this means this is not what Allah تعالى has enjoined on them. That is why after all of this Allah تعالى said: “so you should not be blamed.” i.e. so that there is no hardship for you.

Therefore, the marriages of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم should not be taken as an example to emulate, nor as a subject of legislative discussion because they are unique to him صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم alone. Not to mention that the reality of the Messenger’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriages indicates that they were marriages of a Prophet and not the marriages of a man marrying for sex and satisfaction of the procreation instinct, in terms of the male-female aspect.


Marriage to Khadija (ra)

By returning to the historical reality we find that he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married Khadija (ra) while he was twenty-three years of age. Khadija (ra) remained as his صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم wife for twenty-eight years. She died in the eleventh year of the Prophethood, two years before the Hijra, a few months after the rescission of the boycott document and shortly before his visit to Taif in the year 620CE. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was aged fifty when she died.

He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم did not contemplate since the time he married Khadija (ra) until her death, the prospect of marrying more than one wife, and this was at a time when polygyny was a widespread practise amongst the Arabs.

Before the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was sent with the Message, he spent seventeen years with Khadija (ra) sharing a quiet and tranquil life. He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم lived with her for approximately eleven years after the Prophethood (Bi'tha), in a life of da’wa and struggle against the kufr thoughts. In spite of this he did not consider marrying again.

It was not known of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم during his life with Khadija (ra) or before his marriage to her that he was one of those tempted by the alluring charms of women in an age of ignorance (Jahiliyya) where these charms were used to tempt people.

It is not natural for us to take the view that after passing the age of fifty a sudden change took place in the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم where he wasn’t content with only one wife but rather continued marrying until he had taken ten wives. Within five years in the sixth decade of the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم life he gathered more than seven wives, and in the remaining seven years of the sixth decade and beginning of the seventh the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم gathered nine wives.

At such an age can these marriages be attributed to a desire for women and sexual intercourse? Or were there other motives, which were required by the reality of life that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was engaged in? i.e. the life of the Message, which he had been ordered to convey to the people. In order to understand this issue, let us examine the incidents surrounding the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriages in further detail.


Contracting the marriage to A’isha (ra)

In the eleventh year of the Prophethood, the year in which Khadija (ra) died, the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم considered getting married. He was fifty, and proposed to A’isha (ra), the daughter of Abu Bakr (ra), his friend and the first one who believed in his Prophethood from the men. When she was just a child of six he contracted a marriage with her but did not consummate it for a period of three years until she was nine and fully mature having reached puberty, which happened after the Hijra.


Marriage to Sawda bint Zam’a (ra)

However, at the time in which the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم contracted the marriage with A’isha (ra) he married Sawda bint Zam’a (ra). Sawda (ra) was a widow of al-Sukran b. ‘Amr b. ‘Abd Shams (ra), who was one of the Muslims who had migrated to Abyssinia but died on his return to Makkah. Sawda (ra) had embraced Islam with her husband and she had migrated with him. She had suffered the same difficulties and hardships he suffered and faced the same harm he had faced.

After the death of Sawda’s husband the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married her. It has not been reported that Sawda (ra) was beautiful, or that she possessed wealth or standing, that would make any of the worldly aspects influence the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to her. Since the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم had married her after the death of her husband, the only thing we can deduce from this is that he married her to support her and raise her to the position of the mother of the believers. When he migrated he made the house of Sawda (ra) close to the Mosque. This was the first house the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم built for any of his wives.

Consummation of the marriage to A’isha (ra)

Then, in the first year of the Hijra after the brotherhood between the Ansar and the Muhajireen had been instituted, the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم consummated his marriage with A’isha (ra) and he housed her next to the house of Sawda (ra), close to the Mosque. He allowed his first Wazir (assistant) and friend Abu Bakr as-Siddiq (ra) to come and see him in his house at his daughter's home.

Marriage to Hafsa (ra)

In the second year of the Hijra, after the battle of Badr and before Uhud, he married Hafsa (ra) the daughter of Umar b. al-Khattab (ra). Hafsa (ra), before being married to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم, was the wife of Hanish (ra) who was one of the early converts to Islam. Seven months after Hanish (ra) died the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married her. By marrying Hafsa (ra) he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم enabled his second Wazir, his companion Umar b. al-Khattab (ra) to come to see him in his house at Hafsa’s home.

So the marriages to A’isha (ra) and Hafsa (ra) were marriages to the daughters of his two Wazirs (assistants), the daughters of two companions who persevered with him in Da'wah, ruling and fighting. Therefore such marriages were not only for the purpose of marriage. Although A’isha (ra) was beautiful and the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم found her attractive this was not the case with Hafsa (ra), which indicates that his marriage to both of them was for a purpose other than sexual gratification.


Marriage to Juwayriyya bint al-Harith ibn Abi Dirar (ra)

During the battle of Banu Mustaliq, in the fifth year of the Hijra, he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married Juwayriyya bint al-Harith ibn Abi Dirar (ra). The reason behind his marriage to her was for the purpose of drawing her father closer to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم and raising her position. Juwayriyya (ra) was from the captives of Banu Mustaliq, and had fallen into the hands of one of the Ansar. She was the daughter of the leader of Banu Mustaliq, so she wanted to free herself from her master to whom she had become a slave-girl. Her master increased the ransom money knowing that she was the daughter of the leader of Banu Mustaliq. So her father approached the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم with the ransom required to free her, which he did. Then after believing in the Message of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم he became a Muslim, and he took his daughter Juwayriyya (ra) to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم and she too embraced Islam, so the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم asked her father for her hand in marriage. He married her to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم himself so the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to her was in fact a marriage to the daughter of a leader of a tribe which he had subjugated. His صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم objective was to win the friendship of its leader through marrying his daughter.


Marriage to Safiyya (ra)

In the seventh year of the Hijra after the victory of Khaybar he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married Safiyya (ra) daughter of Huyai ibn al-Akhtab who was one of the leaders of the Jews. The story of his marriage to her began when she was taken along with other captives which the Muslims seized from the fortress of Khaybar. Some of the Muslims advised the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: “Safiyya is a noble lady of Banu Qurayza and Banu Nadhir. She is not suitable for anyone other than you”, so the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم freed her and married her. This was therefore done for her protection and to free her from the bondage of slavery, as well to raise her status. It has been narrated that Abu Ayyub Khalid al-Ansari feared that Safiyya (ra) harboured hatred against the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم who had killed her father, husband and people. For this reason he spent the night, girded with his sword, around the tent in which the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم consummated the marriage with Safiyya (ra) on the way back from Khaybar. When the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم woke up in the morning he noticed him outside the tent and asked him: “What is the matter?” He replied: “I feared for you from this woman. You have killed her father, husband and her people and she has just recently come out of kufr.” So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم set Abu Ayyub’s mind at rest, and Safiyya (ra) remained loyal to the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم until Allah تعالى took his soul.


Marriage to Maymuna (ra)

Later, in the eighth year of Hijra he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married Maymuna (ra) the sister of Umm al-Fadhl, the wife of al-‘Abbas b. Abd ul-Muttalib. He married her in Makkah at the end of the postponed pilgrimage (Umra al-qada) that the Muslims agreed to delay in the treaty of Hudaybiyah. The account of his marriage to her began when Maymuna (ra) was twenty six years of age and that she had delegated her sister Umm al-Fadhl to find a suitor for her, but when she saw the predicament of the Muslims at the umra she herself yearned for Islam.

Therefore, al-‘Abbas proposed to his nephew our Master Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم at her behest and the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم agreed to marry her. The three day time limit on staying Makkah, stipulated by the treaty of Hudaybiyah had expired. But the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم wished to use his marriage to Maymuna (ra) as a means to increase the understanding between himself and the Quraish.

When Suhayl b. ‘Amr and Huwayteb b. ‘Abd ul-‘Uzza came to him representing Quraish they said to Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: “Your time in Makkah has expired, so leave us.” He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said to them: “What is the matter with you? Why do you not leave me? I will hold a wedding feast amongst you. We will prepare food for you so why not attend it?” Their response to him was “we have no need of your food so depart from us.” The Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم did not hesitate and left Makkah along with the rest of the Muslims.


Marriages to Zaynab bint Khuzayma and Umm Salama (ra)

As for his صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to Zaynab bint Khuzayma (ra) and Umm Salama (ra), they were marriages to the two wives of his companions who had been martyred on the battlefield.

Zaynab (ra) was the wife of 'Ubayda b. al-Harith b. al-Muttalib (ra) who was martyred on the day of Badr, she was not of marked beauty, but she was known for her good nature and kindness to the extent that she became nicknamed as the ‘mother of the needy.’ She had passed her youth, but the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married her in the second year of the Hijra, after the battle of Badr and after the martyrdom of her husband. She stayed with him for only two years until Allah تعالى took her soul. After Khadija (ra), Zaynab (ra) was the only one who died before the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.

As for Umm Salama (ra), she was the wife of Abu Salama (ra), who had a number of sons with her. Abu Salama (ra) was injured in Uhud then recovered from it, so the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم agreed to let him fight Banu Asad. He defeated them and returned to Madinah victorious with the booty that had been captured, but the injury he sustained at Uhud worsened and he remained ill until his death shortly afterwards. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was present while he was on his deathbed, and he remained by his side, praying for his wellbeing until he died. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم then closed Abu Salama’s eyes.

Four months after Abu Salama’s death, the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم proposed to Umm Salama (ra) herself, but she made excuses that she had a big family and that she had passed her youth. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم however persisted until he married her and he himself saw to her children’s upbringing.

Therefore it is clear that the Messenger married those two wives to care for the family of two of his companions after their death.


Marriage to Umm Habiba bint Abu Sufyan (ra)

As for his marriage to Umm Habiba bint Abu Sufyan (ra), this was a marriage to a believing woman who had migrated to Abyssinia fleeing with her deen intact. She had remained patient in the path of Islam after her husband had apostatised.

Umm Habiba (ra) was Ramla the daughter of Abu Sufyan, the leader of Makkah and head of the Mushrikin. She was the wife of a cousin (son of a paternal aunt) of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم, 'Ubayd Allah b. Jahsh al-Asadi. 'Ubayd Allah embraced Islam with his wife Ramla whilst her father Abu Sufyan was still upon kufr. She was afraid of hurting her father so she migrated, encumbered by her pregnancy, with her husband to Abbysinia. There in the place of refuge, Ramla gave birth to her daughter Habiba bint 'Ubayd Allah by whom she was named. So she came to be called Umm Habiba although her husband 'Ubayd Allah b. Jahsh did not take long before he left the fold of Islam and professed his belief in Christianity, the religion of the Abyssinians. He tried to take his wife Ramla away from Islam, but she patiently persevered in her deen.

Then the messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم sent for the Negus delegating him to perform the marriage of Umm Habiba (ra) to the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. The Negus informed Umm Habiba (ra) of this, so she delegated Khalid b. Sa'id b. al-'As (ra) to give her in marriage, and her marriage contract with the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم took place. Khalid undertook the marriage contract on her behalf and the Negus for the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. When the Muhajirin of Abbysinia returned to Madinah after the battle of Khaybar, Umm Habiba returned with them and entered the house of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. Madinah celebrated the wedding of the Messenger to Umm Habiba (ra) and she remained in his house.


Marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (ra)

As for his صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (ra) this marriage explained the legislation for a number of customs and traditions of Jahiliyah that contradicted Islam.

Firstly, it was legislation to demolish what was called equivalence or matching between the man and the woman. In marrying a cousin (daughter of his paternal aunt) who was from the leaders of the Quraish, to a former slave that had been freed Zayd (ra).

Secondly, it showed the legislation for the destruction of what had become established amongst them in Jahiliyah, in that adopting a son is like one’s own son, so one cannot marry his wife. Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم married the wife of his freedman Zayd (ra), after he divorced Zaynab in order to destroy those non-Islamic customs.

The account of the Messenger’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to Zaynab bint Jahsh (ra) was that Zaynab bint Jahsh (ra) was the daughter of Umayma bint 'Abd al-Muttalib the paternal aunt of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. She was raised under the Messenger’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم care and attention and because of this, she was to him like a daughter or younger sister. He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم used to know her and knew whether she was attractive or not before she had married Zayd, and he had seen her from the time she was an infant crawling, until her childhood and through to her adolescent years. She was not a stranger to the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم, but rather she was similar in position to his daughter.

He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم proposed to her on behalf of his freed slave Zayd (ra). However, her brother 'Abd Allah b. Jahsh refused the proposal, because Zaynab (ra) was from Quraish and a Hashimite in addition to being a daughter of the aunt of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. Whereas Zayd (ra) was a slave bought by Khadija (ra) and later freed by Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. Zaynab’s brother felt that this was a great shame for Zaynab (ra) as it used to be a great dishonour for the Arabs, as daughters of the nobility did not marry slaves even if they were given their freedom. But Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم wanted these considerations which existed within people solely on the basis of tribalism to be erased and for them to comprehend that there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab except in Taqwa and to understand Allah’s تعال saying:

إِنَّ أَڪۡرَمَكُمۡ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَتۡقَٮٰكُمۡ‌ۚ

“In Allah’s eyes, the most honoured of you are the ones most mindful of Him (taqwa).” [TMQ Al-Hujurat: 13]

The Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم did not consider it right that a woman from other than his own family should be pushed to do this. So Zaynab bint Jahsh (ra), daughter of his aunt, became the one to depart from the traditions of the Arabs and to destroy their customs, paying no attention to what people may say about her

He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم let Zayd (ra), his slave whom he had adopted and who due to the customs and traditions of the Arabs gained the right of inheritance from him, to be the one who would marry Zaynab (ra). The Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم insisted that Zaynab (ra) and her brother 'Abdullah accept Zayd (ra), his freed slave, as her husband. However, Zaynab (ra) persisted in her refusal as did her brother 'Abdullah. As a result Allah تعال revealed the verse:

وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤۡمِنٍ۬ وَلَا مُؤۡمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ ۥۤ أَمۡرًا أَن يَكُونَ لَهُمُ ٱلۡخِيَرَةُ مِنۡ أَمۡرِهِمۡۗ وَمَن يَعۡصِ ٱللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ۥ فَقَدۡ ضَلَّ ضَلَـٰلاً۬ مُّبِينً۬ا

“When Allah and His messenger have decided on a matter that concerns them, it is not fitting for any believing man or women to claim freedom of choice in that matter: whoever disobeys Allah and His messenger is far astray.” [TMQ Al-Ahzab: 36]

Therefore 'Abdullah and Zaynab had no choice but to submit to Allah’s تعال will, so they said: “We consent O Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.”

Zayd (ra) consummated his marriage with Zaynab (ra) after the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم had sent her the bride gift (mahr).

However, married life between Zayd (ra) and Zaynab (ra) was not good. On the contrary, from the start it was unsettled and embittered and continued to be unsettled and embittered. Zaynab (ra) was not happy with this marriage after it had taken place even though it was a command from Allah تعال and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. She did not obey her husband, and she did not soften in her approach towards him. Rather, she boasted to Zayd (ra) that the bondage of slavery had not befallen her and she made life difficult for him.

Zayd (ra) complained to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم on numerous occasions and explained to him about Zaynab’s (ra) bad treatment of him. He sought permission from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم a number of times to divorce her. The Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم used to reply: “Hold on to your wife.”

Then Allah تعال revealed to the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم that Zaynab (ra) will be one of his wives. This was distressing for the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم who feared that people will say that Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم has married his son’s wife and will censure him for that since he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم had adopted Zayd (ra) as a son. Therefore, the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم did not want Zayd (ra) to divorce Zaynab (ra), but Zayd (ra) urged the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم to allow him to divorce her.

Despite the fact that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم knew that Zaynab (ra) would be one of his wives as Allah تعال had informed him of this through revelation, he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم still said to Zayd (ra): “Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allah.” As a result of this Allah تعال mildly reproached the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم since Allah تعال told him that he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم would marry Zaynab (ra) and that he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was concealing within himself that which Allah تعال wanted made known. This is the meaning of Allah’s تعال saying:

وَتُخۡفِى فِى نَفۡسِكَ مَا ٱللَّهُ مُبۡدِيهِ

“You hid in your heart what Allah would later reveal.” [TMQ Al-Ahzab: 37]

The matter that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم concealed was the knowledge that Zaynab (ra) will be his wife even though she was the wife of someone he had adopted. This is what Allah would make manifest afterwards, which was his marriage to a divorcee of someone he had adopted as his son.

The reason for the Messenger’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم concealment of this marriage, which Allah تعال later made manifest, is that it was the custom of the Arabs to keep their adopted sons and daughters in their houses and ensure links with their relations. They used to give the ‘da’iyy’ (the person who is adopted, all the rights of a son.) All the rules of a son were applied to them even in inheritance and the esteem of lineage. So when Allah informed the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم that Zaynab (ra), the wife of his freed slave whom he had adopted will be his wife he hid this knowledge and strictly insisted that Zayd (ra) hold on to his wife and not divorce her. This is despite Zayd’s (ra) insistence, his complaints about her, and the lack of harmony between them in their marital life ever since he married her. Zayd (ra) insisted on divorcing her so the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم gave him permission, and he eventually divorced her without any knowledge that the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم would marry her and without Zaynab (ra) herself knowing that the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم would take her as his wife.

This is illustrated by what Ahmad, Muslim and an-Nisa’i have reported from Sulayman b. al-Mughira on the authority of Thabit that Anas who said: When the 'Iddah (divorce period) of Zaynab was over, Allah’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said to Zayd to mention him to her. So I (Zayd) went to her and said: ‘O Zaynab rejoice! Allah’s Messenger sent me to propose to you on his behalf.’ She said: ‘I do not do anything until I see my Lord order me.’ So she stood at her place of worship and Allah’s Messenger came to her without permission when the verses of the Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed:

فَلَمَّا قَضَىٰ زَيۡدٌ۬ مِّنۡہَا وَطَرً۬ا زَوَّجۡنَـٰكَهَا لِكَىۡ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ۬ فِىٓ أَزۡوَٲجِ أَدۡعِيَآٮِٕهِمۡ إِذَا قَضَوۡاْ مِنۡہُنَّ وَطَرً۬اۚ

“When Zayd no longer wanted her, We gave her to you in marriage so that there might be no fault in believers marrying the wives of their adopted sons after they no longer wanted them.” [TMQ Al-Ahzab: 37]

If either Zaynab (ra) or Zayd (ra) had known that Allah تعال had ordered the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم to marry Zaynab then Zayd would not have said to her ‘rejoice,’ nor she said ‘until I see my Lord order me.’ i.e. she left the matter to Allah to guide her in this marriage. The 'Illa (legal reason) of this marriage is so that there is no sin on the believer in marrying the wife of someone they had adopted.


Conclusion

This is the account of the Messenger’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriages to his wives. It is clear that each one was for an objective other than the mere aim of marrying. The intent of the Prophet’s صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم marriage to more than four wives and why this number is unique to him compared to the rest of his Ummah is now clear.

The fact that the objective was not the agitation of the procreation instinct of a man who had passed the age of fifty is quite evident, since he was a man who was busy with the Da’wa, engaged in conveying the Message of his Lord to the world so that he may revive a people and mould them into an Ummah whose only aim in life was to carry the Message of Allah to the world.

His صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم aim was to build the society anew after he had demolished the previous structures, and establish a state pushing ahead the world before it, in order to carry the Call of Islam to the people. Anyone whose mind is occupied with the revival of an Ummah, the establishment of a state, the building of a society, and the carrying of the Message to the world cannot be preoccupied by women devoting himself to them and marrying one every year. Rather, he carried his Da'wah and he enjoyed a normal married life like any other human.

Western Occupation vs Islamic Conquests

Western Occupation under colonialism


  • Iraqi death toll. 650,000 Muslims killed in Iraq since the American-led invasion
  • Haditha Massacre. 24 Iraqi men, women and children executed by US Marines.
  • Ishaqi Massacre. US troops execute 11 Iraqi's - five children and four women in the same house.
  • Majat-al-Kabir Massacre. British troops torture, mutilate and execute 20 Iraqi captives.
  • Kenyan Rapes. British troops stationed in Kenya accused of raping over 650 women over the past 20 years.
  • Okinawa Rapes. Curfew imposed on US troops after US Marine rapes a 14-year-old Japanese girl. In 1995 a 12-year-old Japanese girl was gang raped by US troops stationed in Okinawa.
  • Somalia. Belgian UN troops photographed themselves roasting a Somalia boy alive.
  • Srebrenica Massacre. Dutch UN troops handover Srebrenica to the Serbs so they can massacre 8000 Muslims
  • Jenin Massacre. Israeli troops massacre over 500 Palestinian refugees in Jenin.

Khalid Nisaif Jassim whose pregnant sister was shot by US troops as she was rushed to hospital in Samarra summed up western occupation when he said, "God take revenge on the Americans...They have no regard for our lives.


Islamic Conquests under the Khilafah


Abu Yusuf (ra) in his classical book ‘Kitab Al-Kharaj' gives the following report of the Islamic Conquest of Syria.

After getting on peaceful terms with the people of Syria and collecting the dues of the Jizya and the Kharaj, news reached Abu ‘Ubeida that the Byzantines had amassed their troops to attack him. The effect of this was great on Abu ‘Ubeida and the Muslims. He sent messages to the rulers of cities with whose citizens he had made peace, asking them to return to their subjects the paid dues of the Jizya and Kharaj with an instruction to tell them: ‘We hereby return to you the money you have paid us, because of the news of the enemy troops amassed to attack us, but, if God grants us victory against the enemy, we will keep up to the promise and covenant between us.' When this was delivered to the dhimmi and their money returned to them, they told the Muslims: ‘May God bring you back to us and grant you victory over them!'


Moulding People into One Ummah

The Messenger of Allah (saw) passed away after the entire Arabian Peninsula had entered into the fold of Islam and polytheism had been abolished. The Peninsula was under the Islamic domain, ruled comprehensively by Islam according to its ‘Aqeedah and the system that emanated from it. He (saw)died only after Allah (swt) had perfected the Deen, completed His favour unto the Muslims and chose for them Islam as that Deen. This included the invitation of neighbouring nations and people to Islam by sending envoys to their kings and rulers as well as by dispatching expeditions to raid the Roman frontiers of Mu’tah and Tabuk.

Then came the Khulafah al-Rashidun, and the conquests continued. Iraq was inhabited by a mixture of Arabs and Persians who professed the faiths of the Christians, Mazdakyya and Zoroastrians and this was the first country to be conquered. Persia followed next and al-Sham after that. Persia was inhabited by Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians and ruled over by the Persians while al-Sham was a Roman colony where the Roman culture and Christianity were predominant. Syrians, Armenians, Jews, Arabs and a few Romans lived there. Egypt was conquered after this and it too was inhabited by a mixture of people, such as the Copts, Jews and Romans. North Africa followed suit and this was where the Berbers lived under Roman dominance. Along came the Ummayads and they conquered Sind, Khawarizm and Samarqand, joining them to the Islamic State in the process. Al-Andalus was then conquered and became a Wilayah of the Islamic State.

The inhabitants of these countries varied in the ethnicity, language, religion, traditions, customs, laws and culture. They naturally differed from each other in mentality and attitude. Therefore, the process of moulding these countries together and of uniting them into one single Ummah, adopting the same Deen, language, culture and laws was a colossal task. Success would be a tremendous and extraordinary achievement. This happened solely through Islam and was only achieved by the Islamic State. Once those people were identified by the banner of Islam and ruled by the Islamic State. They became a single Ummah, which is the Islamic Ummah. This feat was due to the effect of Islamic rule and Islamic ‘Aqeedah.

Many factors led to the successful moulding of these disparate people into one Ummah, the most important of which were the following four factors:

1) The teachings of Islam.
2) The cohabitation of the Muslims with the liberated people in their daily life and work.
3) The quick embracing of Islam by the people of the conquered countries.
4) The radical change in the life of those who embraced Islam and their transformation from a dismal situation to a better one.

The teachings of Islam oblige Muslims to call for Islam and spread its guidance wherever and whenever possible. This necessitates Jihad and the conquest of other countries in order to enable people to understand it and contemplate the truthfulness of its rules. It also gives the people the choice between embracing Islam or retaining their faith if they so wished, provided that they submit to its rules related to matters of transactions and penal code.

This last point is important because it would develop harmony in the people’s actions and dealings once the system and rules that deal with their problems became unified, and it would also serve to make the non-Muslims feel like Muslims by being part of the society, sharing the same system, enjoying the peace of mind and the guardianship of the State.

The teachings of Islam necessitate that the ruled people should be looked upon from a human point of view and not a racial, tribal or sectarian one.

Therefore, the Islamic laws related to social and penal matters must be equally implemented upon every citizen, with no difference between the Muslims or non-Muslims.

Allah (saw) says in Surah al-Ma’idah,

“Do not let hatred of others lead you away from justice, but adhere to justice, for that is closer to awareness of Allah. Be mindful of Allah: Allah is well aware of all that you do.” [TMQ 5:8]

All people are equal in the eyes of the law. The ruler looks after the people’s affairs and rules over them. The judge settles people’s disputes without any prejudice. He looks upon them from a human point of view with the aim of solving their problems and settling their disputes. The ruling system in Islam introduces true unity and equality between the different regions of the State.

Islam commands the rulers to guarantee the basic needs of all the Wilayat of the State with grants provided by the treasury, regardless of the amount of revenues being collected from each Wilayah, and regardless of whether these levies cover the expenditure or not. Islam commands a single financial policy by collecting levies for the treasury from all the Wilayat, thus helping to mould the conquered countries into Wilayat and making them into one State. This is what the Islamic ruling system would and did inevitably achieve.

The mixing of the Muslim with the indigenous people was one of the major factors that led to those people entering Islam and integrating with other Muslims. After conquering a country, the Muslims would take up residence there and begin teaching the people Islam and Islamic culture. They lived in neighbouring houses, they shared in all of life’s affairs and became subjects of one country, being ruled by the same laws. There never existed two different segregated communities divided into conquerors and conquered, winners and the defeated. They were all citizens of the State who helped each other in their daily affairs. The conquered people looked upon the rulers as being a different Moulding People into one Ummah type of people whom they had never encountered before. They witnessed the equality with which they treated them by placing themselves on the same level and serving them and managing their affairs. They experienced fine treatment by rulers of high qualities and this made them adherent towards the rulers and towards Islam. The rulers and other Muslims would marry women from the People of the Book (Jews and Christians), eat their slaughtered meat and their food. This served as an incentive for them to enter Islam because they witnessed the effect of Islam through the rulers and saw the light of Islam through the system being implemented upon them. As a result, these people became integrated and constituted a single Ummah.

The entering of the indigenous people into Islam was not limited to a time period or a country. The people of each country embraced Islam en masse. People continued to enter into Islam until most of them were Muslims, and thus Islam was not merely confined to Muslim conquerors. By entering into Islam, the people of the conquered countries integrated with the conquerors and became one single Ummah.

The comprehensive change that Islam caused in those who embraced it led to the raising of the intellectual level of those new Muslims. This developed in them the Islamic ‘Aqeedah which became an ideological basis upon which all concepts were founded and measured. As a result, Islam took them from an emotional based belief (faith) to a rationally founded belief. It transformed them from the worship of idols, icons, other human beings, and fire, and the belief in the trinity and other similar types of worship, which led to a steep decline in the intellectual level, to the worship of Allah (swt), which led and will continue to lead to the establishment of an enlightened mind. Islam made them believe in the Hereafter and led them to comprehend it in the way that the Qur’an and the Sunnah have presented it and the reward and punishment in it.

So they conceived of it as being real and this led them to acquire a true meaning of this life thus being the path to another happier and eternal life. They held life with open arms and they did not neglect it. They took its means and enjoyed the pleasures and wealth that Allah (swt) - the One who provided the right criteria and perceptions of life.

Prior to the advent of Islam, their criterion of life was based on personal interest as the only controls to perform any action. After the acceptance of Islam, the criterion of their actions changed and came to be based on what is Halal and what is Haram. This criterion became the driving force behind their actions, and its guidelines were according to what Allah (swt) had commanded and prohibited. The aim of their actions became attaining Allah’s pleasure.

The value of the action became the objective behind the performance of the action. It would be spiritual if it were prayer or Jihad; material if it were buying or selling; moral if it was a trust or an act of compassion; humanitarian if one was being assisted in a crisis, etc. People began differentiating between the motive behind the action and the value of the action. As a result, their conception of life became different from their previous one. It became the true conception about the life measured by a criterion that Islam had set, this being the commands of Allah (swt).

Islam gave the people a true meaning of happiness. Happiness had been, in their original view, the satisfaction of their instincts and organic needs. It came to be transformed into gaining the pleasure of Allah (swt). This entails true happiness because true happiness means total and permanent peace of mind and this can never be achieved merely through satisfying the human desires and acquiring material pleasures. It can only be achieved by obtaining the pleasure of the Lord of the Universe. This is how Islam affected the viewpoint of the people who embraced it.

Their viewpoint about life and the actions which they performed in this life changed. Their order of priorities also changed, some went up in value and others came down. Life to the human being was at the top of his list of priorities to begin with and the ideology came second. Then Islam came and reversed the situation so that the ideology came to the top of the human being’s priorities in life. As a result of this, the Muslims began to devote their lives to the service of Islam because they correctly considered that Islam was more precious than life and it was only a natural corollary for the Muslim to endure hardship and sacrifice in the way of Islam. Life’s matters came to be placed in their appropriate order of priority. Life became honourable and dignified and the Muslim acquired a permanent peace of mind once he set his ultimate objective to that being the pleasure of Allah (swt). Moulding People into one Ummah

The new Muslims’ concept of the highest ideal changed therein. In the past the people had different and ever changing ideals. Now they acquired the one and only ultimate objective. This resulted in the changing of things that mattered to them and in changing the definition of virtue. The basis of virtues formerly included things like personal courage, individual decency and respectability, sectarian backing, boasting about wealth and noble descent, generosity to the point of extravagance, faithfulness to the tribe or clan, mercilessness in revenge and other similar acts. Islam changed all that. It made all of these qualities trivial, which the human could take or leave according to Allah’s decrees, not according to the benefits they generated, nor to the pride or prestige which they entailed, nor because they were traditions or customs or a heritage one had to preserve. Islam mandated the submission to Allah’s orders only. Therefore, Islam enjoined the submitting of the individual, tribal, popular, and national interests to the commands of Islam only.

This is how Islam transformed the mentalities and attitudes of the people who embraced it. It changed their personalities and their evaluation of man, life and the universe. It completely altered their criteria concerning all of life’s matters. People began realizing that life held a special meaning which was perfection and nobleness. They acquired a supreme ideal which was securing the pleasure of Allah (swt), and that was the happiness which they vigorously pursued. Therefore, they became different creatures from those which they had once been.

These four major factors helped to detach all the people who embraced Islam from their former circumstances. Their concepts and visions of life became unified into one concept and one vision. The management of their affairs sprang from that concept. Their interests also became unified and they became one interest, i.e. the interest of Islam. Their goals in life became a single goal, which was the spreading of Allah’s word. In total, the integration of these people into Islam was inevitable and they eventually became a single Ummah, the Islamic Ummah.

The above article is an extract from the book Islamic State by Taqiudeen an-Nabhani. Download the full book here.

InSiDen MoNas dan PeCah BeLah ALa RAND CorPoRaTion

(Civil Democratic Islam, Parters, Resources, and Strategies; By Cheryl Benard)
Syabab.Com - Upaya politik adu domba di negeri ini mulai nampak. Terutama setelah terjadinya insiden Monas. Pembagian umat Islam menjadi radikalis dan kaum moderat menguak di beberapa media. Demikian juga suara kaum liberalis yang mengatasnamakan ham, pluralisme dan kebebasan bak pahlawan. Sedangkan para aktivis Islam dilabeli radikal. Skenario global asing dalam memecahbelah umat Islam di negeri ini semakin nyata. Tujuannya tiada lain untuk melenyapkan Islam di muka bumi ini. Karena Islam telah menjadi ancaman bagi Amerika, baik secara hostility maupun capabilty-nya. Berikut sebuah analisis politik adu domba ala Rand Corporation. [Pengantar Redaksi]

Adanya politik adu domba di balik insiden Monas semakin menguat. Pernyataan Ketua Umum PBNU Hasyim Muzadi mengingatkan pihak-pihak tertentu untuk tidak melibatkan NU menyusul insiden Monas 1 Juni. “NU akan memberikan sanksi kepada siapa pun yang melakukan provokasi,” tegasnya.

Hasyim menyesalkan penggunaan dan pelibatan nama NU dan kelompok NU dalam masalah ini. “Karena relevansinya tidak ada antara NU dan Monas, NU dan FPI. Tapi, kenapa lalu ditulis korban itu adalah orang NU?” ujar Ketua PBNU Hasyim Muzadi dalam pernyataan tertulis pada detikcom, Selasa (3/6/2008).

KH Hasyim Muzadi juga mengingatkan pelibatan orang-orang NU yang menjadikan NU sebagai pihak yang juga terlibat dalam bentrok fisik itu. “Ini tidak boleh terjadi dan harus dicegah. Bentrok fisik sangat merugikan. Kita ingin menyelesaikan masalah Monas, bukan memperluas masalah itu,” tegasnya.

Upaya mengadu domba antara NU dan ormas Islam lain seperti FPI memang sangat terasa. Tampak dari reaksi warga NU diberbagai daerah yang mendatangi markas FPI. Konflik horizontal pun dikhawatirkan meluas di daerah-daerah.

Tidak hanya itu , perluasan insiden Monas juga tampak dari upaya membangun opini seakan-akan lasyar Islam menyerang kelompok memperingati hari kesaktian Pancasila. Serangan ini dianggap ancaman terhadap Pancasila, ideologi negara, dan pada gilirannya dianggap merupakan ancaman terhadap negara.

Upaya adu domba yang konflik horisontal ini tidak bisa dilepaskan dari grand-strategi negara-negara Imperialis untuk menghancurkan umat Islam dan kekuatan Islam. Untuk itu, negara-negara Imperialis seperti AS memanfaatkan LSM-LSM komprador yang menjadi kaki tangannya untuk memprovokasi konflik.

Campur tangan asing tampak dari kecaman kedubes AS terhadap insiden Monas. Kedubes AS di Indonesia mengeluarkan siaran pers yang mengutuk aksi kekerasan oleh FPI. AS menilai, aksi itu berdampak serius bagi kebebasan beragama dan dapat menimbulkan masalah keamanan. Namun, pernyataan Kedubes AS itu dinilai anggota Fraksi PKS di DPR, Soeripto, sebagai bentuk campur tangan AS dalam masalah dalam negeri. ”Itu tidak etis. Bahasa kasarnya intervensi. Seakan-akan pemerintah kita yang lemah,” katanya.

Grands strategi ini bisa terlihat dengan jelas dari rekomendasi Rand Corporation yang merupakan think-thank neo-conservative AS yang banyak mendukung kebijakan Gedung Putih. Dalam rekomendasi Cheryl Benard dari Rand Corporation yang berjudul CIVIL DEMOCRATIC SILAM , PARTERS ,RESOURCES, AND STRATEGIES secara detil diungkap upaya untuk memecah belah umat Islam.

Strategi: Pecah Belah Kelompok Islam

Langkah pertama melakukan klasifikasi terhadap umat Islam berdasarkan kecendrungan dan sikap politik mereka terhadap Barat dan nilai-nilai Demokrasi.

Pertama: Kelompok Fundamentalis : menolak nilai-nilai demokrasi dan kebudayaan Barat kontemporer. Mereka menginginkan sebuah negara otoriter yang puritan yang akan dapat menerapkan Hukum Islam yang ekstrem dan moralitas. Mereka bersedia memakai penemuan dan teknologi modern untuk mencapai tujuan mereka.

Kedua: Kelompok Tradisionalis: ingin suatu masyarakat yang konservatif. Mereka mencurigai modernitas, inovasi, dan perubahan.

Ketiga: Kelompok Modernis : ingin Dunia Islam menjadi bagian modernitas global. Mereka ingin memodernkan dan mereformasi Islam dan menyesuaikannya dengan zaman.

Keempat: Kelompok Sekularis : ingin Dunia Islam untuk dapat menerima pemisahan antara agama dan negaradengan cara seperti yang dilakukan negara-negara demokrasi industri Barat, dengan agama dibatasi pada lingkup pribadi.

Strategi Belah Bambu dan Adu Domba

Setelah membagi-bagi umat Islam atas empat kelompok itu, langkah berikutnya yang penting yang direkomendasi Rand Corporation adalah politik belah bambu. Mendukung satu pihak dan menjatuhkan pihak lain, berikutnya membentrokkan antar kelompok tersebut. Upaya itu tampak jelas dari upaya membentrokkan antara NU yang dikenal tradisionalis dengan ormas Islam yang Barat sering disebut Fundamentalis seperti FPI, HTI, atau MMI.

Hal ini dirancang sangat detil. Berikut langkah-langkahnya :

Pertama: Support the modernists first (mendukung kelompok Modernis)

  • Menerbitkan dan mengedarkan karya-karya mereka dengan biaya yang disubsidi.
  • Mendorong mereka untuk menulis bagi audiens massa dan bagi kaum muda.
  • Memperkenalkan pandangan-pandangan mereka dalam kurikulum pendidikan Islam.
  • Memberikan mereka suatu platform publik
  • Menyediakan bagi mereka opini dan penilaian pada pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang fundamental dari interpretasi agama bagi audiensi massa dalam persaingan mereka dengan kaum fundamentalis dan tradisionalis, yang memiliki Web sites, dengan menerbitkan dan menyebarkan pandangan-pandangan mereka dari rumah-rumah, sekolah-sekolah, lembaga-lembaga, dan sarana yang lainnya.
  • Memposisikan sekularisme dan modernisme sebagai sebuah pilihan “counterculture” bagi kaum muda Islam yang tidak puas.
  • Memfasilitasi dan mendorong kesadaran akan sejarah pra-Islam dan non-Islam dan budayannya, di media dan di kurikulum dari negara-negara yang relevan.
  • Membantu dalam membangun organisasi-organisasi sipil yang independent, untuk mempromosikan kebudayaan sipil (civic culture) dan memberikan ruang bagi rakyat biasa untuk mendidik diri mereka sendiri mengenai proses politik dan mengutarakan pandangan-pandangan mereka.

Kedua, Support the traditionalists against the fundamentalists (Mendukung kaum tradisionalis dalam menentang kaum fundamentalis). Langkah-langkah yang dilakukan antara lain :

  • Menerbitkan kritik-kritik kaum tradisionalis atas kekerasan dan ekstrimisme yang dilakukan kaum fundamentalis; mendorong perbedaan antara kaum tradisionalis dan fundamentalis.
  • Mencegah aliansi antara kaum tradisionalis dan kaum fundamentalis.
  • Mendorong kerja sama antara kaum modernis dan kaum tradisionalis yang lebih dekat dengan kaum modernis.
  • Jika memungkinkan, didik kaum tradisionalis untuk mempersiapkan diri mereka
  • untuk mampu melakukan debat dengan kaum fundamentalis. Kaum fundamentalis
  • secara retorika seringkali lebih superior, sementara kaum tradisionalis melakukan praktek politik „Islam pinggiran” yang kabur . Di tempat-tempat seperti di Asia Tengah, mereka mungkin perlu untuk dididik dan dilatih dalam Islam ortodoks untuk mampu mempertahankan pandangan mereka.
  • Menambah kehadiran dan profil kaum modernis pada lembaga-lembaga tradisionalis.
  • Melakukan diskriminasi antara sektor-sektor tradisionalisme yang berbeda. Mendorong orang-orang dengan ketertarikan yang lebih besar atas modernisme, seperti pada Mazhab Hanafi, lawan yang lainnya. Mendorong mereka untuk membuat isu opini-opini agama dan mempopulerkan hal itu untuk memperlemah otoritas dari penguasa yang terinspirasi oleh paham Wahhabi yang terbelakang. Hal ini berkaitan dengan pendanaan. Uang dari Wahhabi diberikan untuk mendukung Mazhab Hambali yang konservatif. Hal ini juga berkaitan dengan pengetahuan. Bagian dari Dunia Islam yang lebih terbelakang tidak sadar akan kemajuan penerapan dan tafsir dari Hukum Islam.
  • Mendorong popularitas dan penerimaan atas Sufisme

Ketiga, Confront and oppose the fundamentalists (Mengkonfrontir dan menentang kaum fundamentalis). Langkah-langkahnya antara lain :

  • Menentang tafsir mereka atas Islam dan menunjukkan ketidak akuratannya.
  • Mengungkap keterkaitan mereka dengan kelompok-kelompok dan aktivitas-aktiviats illegal.
  • Mengumumkan konsekuensi dari tindakan kekerasan yang mereka lakukan.
  • Menunjukkan ketidak mampuan mereka untuk memerintah, untuk mendapatkan perkembangan positif atas negara-negara mereka dan komunitas-komunitas mereka.
  • Mengamanatkan pesan-pesan ini kepada kaum muda, masyarakat tradisionalis yang alim, kepada minoritas kaum muslimin di Barat, dan kepada wanita.
  • Mencegah menunjukkan rasa hormat dan pujian akan perbuatan kekerasan dari kaum Fundamentalis, ekstrimis dan teroris. Kucilkan mereka sebagai pengganggu dan pengecut, bukan sebagai pahlawan.
  • Mendorong para wartawan untuk memeriksa isu-isu korupsi, kemunafikan, dan tidak bermoralnya lingkaran kaum fundamentalis dan kaum teroris.
  • Mendorong perpecahan antara kaum fundamentalis.

Keempat, Secara selektif mendukung kaum sekuler:

  • Mendorong pengakuan fundamentalisme sebagai suatu musuh bersama, mematahkan aliansi dengan kekuatan-kekuatan anti Amerika berdasarkan hal-hal seperti nasionalisme dan ideologi kiri.
  • Mendorong ide bahwa agama dan Negara juga dapat dipisahkan dalam Islam dan bahwa Hal ini tidak membahayakan keimanan tapi malah akan memperkuatnya. Pendekatan manapun atau kombinasi pendekatan manapun yang diambil, kami sarankan bahwa hal itu dilakukan dengan sengaja dan secara hati-hati, dengan mengetahui beban simbolis dari isu-isu yang pasti; konsekuensi dari penyesuaian ini bagi pelaku-pelaku Islam lain, termasuk resiko mengancam atau mencemari kelompok-kelompok atau orang-orang yang sedang kita berusahah bantu; dan kesempatan biaya-biaya dan konsekuensi afiliasi yang tidak diinginkan dan pengawasan yang tampaknya pas buat mereka dalam jangka pendek.

Sebuah Catatan

Sudah sangat nyata strategi Rand Corporation ini terjadi di negeri yang mayoritas penduduknya muslim terbesar di dunia ini. Perlu diketahui bahwa Amerika akan menjadikan sesuatu menjadi suatu ancaman dilihat dari dua hal, yakni dari sisi hostility dan capability-nya.

Pertama dari sisi hostilty (permusuhan), Amerika akan menjadikan sebuah ancaman bagi sesuatu yang dianggap memiliki permusuhan. Setelah ideologi sosialisme komunisme tumbang, maka yang menjadi musuh bagi Amerika yang mengemban ideologi kapitalisme itu tiada lain adalah Islam. Mengapa? Karena Islam sebagai sebuah ideologi sangat bersebrangan dengan ideologi kapitalisme. Sebagai contoh, dalam perekonmian: bila kapitalisme memandang bahwa siapa saja berhak dalam berkepmilikan sesuatu termasuk sumber daya alam yang sangat penting bagi kebutuhan masyarakat, maka dalam sistem Islam terdapat konsep tiga kepemilikan barang. Kepemilikan individu, umum dan negara. Sumber daya alam seperti barang tambang tak berhak dimiliki oleh sekelompok orang karena itu milik umat. Dalam sistem kapitalisme, apapun boleh dimiliki.

Kedua, dari sisi capability (kemampuan). Amerika akan menjadikan sesuatu menjadi ancaman bila suatu negeri memiliki kemampuan yang kuat untuk menegakkan ideologinya tersebut. Islam menjadi ancaman serius bagi AS, karena umat Islam saat ini cenderung dalam menegakkan kemampuan tadi melalui tegaknya Khilafah Islamiyyah. Walaupun Islam belum memiliki capability untuk itu, namun saat ini di dunia sedang terjadi sebuah kesadaran global bagi kaum Muslim baik di negeri Arab, Asia bahkan Eropa yang merindukan institusi penyatu ummat itu.

Untuk menangkal ini semua, maka Amerika harus mengeluarkan kebijakan luar negerinya. Diantaranya adalah menghentikan munculnya ancaman-ancaman tersebut. Untuk menghentikan merebaknya ideologi Islam tersebut maka diperlukan orang-orang Islam sendiri yang menyampaikan Islam ala Amerika bukan Islam yang sebenarnya. Ada tiga negara yang tengah dijadikan target dalam menghadang ancaman tersebut, yaitu Turki, negara-negara Eropa dan Indonesia. Mengapa Indonesia menjadi target? Karena di negeri ini paling potensial merebaknya ideologi Islam dan berpendudukan Muslim terbesar di dunia. [f/dari berbagai sumber/ syabab.com]